PHARMACOKINETICS · PK/PD

Minimum effective concentration

also: MEC, threshold concentration, subtherapeutic threshold

The lowest plasma drug concentration that produces a clinically meaningful pharmacological effect — the lower boundary of the therapeutic window. Concentrations below the MEC are subtherapeutic: the drug is present in the body, but insufficient to produce the desired effect.

Position in therapeutic window
Lower boundary (MEC → MTC)
TDM relevance
Cmin must stay ≥ MEC for continuous efficacy
PD model reference
E = Emax × C^n / (EC50^n + C^n); MEC ≈ 10–20% Emax
Antimicrobial equivalent
MIC (pathogen-specific)

MEC within the therapeutic window

Above MTC → Toxic zone: adverse effects, organ toxicity
↕ Therapeutic window (MEC to MTC)
Target range where efficacy is achieved without unacceptable toxicity
Below MEC → Subtherapeutic: drug present but no meaningful effect

For drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, the distance between MEC and MTC is small — small dose changes or PK variability can breach either boundary.

Frequently asked questions

What is the minimum effective concentration (MEC)?
The MEC is the minimum plasma concentration that produces the target pharmacological effect — the lower bound of the therapeutic window. Below MEC: drug is present but effect is insufficient. MECs are endpoint-specific: ibuprofen's analgesic MEC ≠ its anti-inflammatory MEC. They are also patient-specific — receptor density, affinity, and downstream signalling variability mean MECs differ between individuals. For antimicrobials, MEC is replaced conceptually by the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) — a microorganism-specific parameter. Foundational PK/PD: NIH/NCBI pharmacokinetics overview ↗.
How is the MEC related to the therapeutic window and Cmin?
Therapeutic window = MEC (lower) to minimum toxic concentration/MTC (upper). In TDM, the trough (Cmin) represents the nadir of the dosing interval — it must remain ≥ MEC for continuous efficacy. For narrow therapeutic index drugs, the ratio MTC/MEC is close to 1, making precise dosing critical. Example: aminoglycosides (concentration-dependent killing) — the peak must exceed the MEC by a large margin (peak/MEC ratio target ~8–12 for efficacy); trough must fall below the MTC to avoid nephrotoxicity. See TDM guide for clinical application.
How does the MEC relate to pharmacodynamic models?
PD context: the sigmoid Emax (Hill) model describes E = Emax × Cn / (EC50n + Cn). MEC is empirically defined as the minimum clinically meaningful effect concentration — often 10–20% of Emax for analgesics. In analgesic PK/PD, the analgesic MEC must be exceeded for pain relief; the toxic minimum concentration must not be exceeded. Time above MEC (t>MEC) predicts analgesic coverage duration for opioids. For anti-infectives, the equivalent is %T>MIC ↗ (% dosing interval above MIC). Related: AUC, pharmacokinetics basics, pharmacodynamics basics.
How does the dosing interval affect time above MEC?
t>MEC = the fraction of the dosing interval that C(t) exceeds MEC. For time-dependent PD (beta-lactams: %T>MIC ≥40–70% correlates with efficacy): favour more frequent dosing or extended/continuous infusion — Drusano continuous infusion review (PubMed) ↗. For concentration-dependent PD (aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones: Cmax/MIC or AUC/MIC drive killing): once-daily high doses preferred. For analgesics: both peak magnitude and t>MEC predict response. Extended-release formulations increase t>MEC without increasing peak — improving coverage and reducing adverse effects from peak concentrations. Related: accumulation factor, steady state, peak-to-trough ratio.