Summit ISoP · EMA EU · Global · Hybrid

Pharmacovigilance World Summit 2027

The Pharmacovigilance World Summit 2027 brings together drug safety scientists, regulatory affairs professionals, clinical pharmacologists, and public health experts from over 60 countries to address advances in safety signal detection, pharmacoepidemiology, EMA DARWIN EU, post-market surveillance, risk minimisation, and AI-assisted safety data analytics.

Dates: September 15–17, 2027 Venue: ExCeL London, London, UK Format: In-person + virtual
ISoP Meetings page ↗

About the Summit

The Pharmacovigilance World Summit brings together drug safety professionals, regulatory scientists, and pharmacoepidemiologists across industry, academia, and health agencies at ExCeL London for three days of presentations, workshops, and networking. The 2027 programme focuses on the transition from spontaneous-report-based safety monitoring to proactive, data-driven pharmacovigilance using real-world evidence networks.

Key themes include the expansion of EMA's DARWIN EU network to cover all EU member states, updated signal detection methodology using AI-assisted disproportionality analysis, the newly revised GVP guidelines ↗, and post-market commitments for accelerated approvals — including the transition from confirmatory trial requirements to RWE-based confirmations. Special sessions address biologics pharmacovigilance (immunogenicity monitoring) and DILI safety biomarker qualification.

Continuing Professional Development (CPD) credits are provided through the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) for UK attendees, and ACPE-accredited CPE for US participants via the ISoP partnership programme.

2027 Programme Highlights

DARWIN EU: 2 Years On

Outcomes from the first DARWIN EU post-authorisation safety studies — lessons for MAHs designing PASS studies, data quality challenges across EU health databases, and integration with EudraVigilance signal management.

DILI Safety Biomarkers

Implementation of miR-122, GLDH, and CK-18 in clinical trials following the FDA DILI biomarker guidance. Assay standardisation, sample handling, and qualification pathway to surrogate endpoint status. See our DILI guide.

AI-Assisted Signal Detection

NLP extraction of adverse events from case narratives, ML-based signal prioritisation in EudraVigilance, and LLM-assisted causality assessment. Regulatory validation requirements and EMA's AI reflection paper.

Biologics Immunogenicity

Anti-drug antibody (ADA) monitoring in post-market biosimilar switching, immunogenicity risk minimisation in biologic RMPs, and new EMA guideline on ADA assay validation for pharmacovigilance purposes. See our mAb pharmacology guide.

RMP/REMS Reform

Proposals for simplified RMP format under the revised EMA GVP Module V, comparative analysis with FDA REMS outcomes data, and impact of the clozapine REMS update on REMS design principles for other high-risk drugs.

Pharmacoepidemiology Methods

Active comparator new-user design, negative control outcomes, and E-value for unmeasured confounding in observational PASS studies. Complements ISPE Europe 2027 methodology sessions. See our clinical trial guide.

Frequently asked questions

What is pharmacovigilance and what are its regulatory requirements?
Pharmacovigilance regulatory framework: EU: GVP Modules (EMA) — Module VI (management and reporting of AEs), Module VII (PSUR/PBRER), Module VIII (PASS), Module XVI (RMPs). QPPV requirement. EMA pharmacovigilance ↗. US: 21 CFR 314.81 (post-market reporting), MedWatch Form 3500A. FDA MedWatch ↗. Australia: TGA DAEN (Database of Adverse Event Notifications). See our DILI biomarker guidance news for a recent safety signal example.
What is the EMA DARWIN EU programme and how does it change pharmacovigilance?
DARWIN EU ↗: federated RWE network covering 100M+ EU patients. No data centralisation — analyses run locally, results pooled. Applications: (1) Real-world comparative effectiveness; (2) Signal evaluation: when spontaneous reports suggest a safety signal, DARWIN EU quantifies population-level incidence; (3) PASS (Post-Authorisation Safety Studies) — MAH obligations to confirm safety in post-market populations; (4) AESI background rates for benefit-risk evaluation. Contrast with US FDA Sentinel System ↗ (claims-based) and RCT vs RWE design differences.
How are safety signals detected in spontaneous reporting systems?
Signal detection methods: PRR (Yellow Card/MHRA): (a/b) / (c/d) > 2.0 with ≥3 cases and χ² ≥4. ROR (EudraVigilance): odds ratio of drug-event vs drug-nonevent and nodrug-event. MGPS/EBGM05 (FDA FAERS): Bayesian shrinkage — EBGM05 > 2.0 as signal threshold. BCPNN/IC025 (WHO VigiBase): IC025 > 0 as signal. Databases: FDA FAERS ↗, EudraVigilance ↗, WHO VigiAccess ↗. Limitation: spontaneous reports have known biases (under-reporting, stimulated reporting, notoriety bias). See our clinical trial guide for RWE study design context.
What is a Risk Management Plan (RMP) and when is one required?
RMP structure (EMA GVP Module V): (1) Safety specification: identified risks (confirmed causal association), potential risks (insufficient evidence for causality), missing information (gaps — paediatric data, long-term use, pregnancy). (2) Pharmacovigilance plan: additional PV activities (PASS, registries, enhanced PMS). (3) Risk minimisation: routine (SmPC, PIL, pack size limitation) + additional (healthcare professional educational programmes, controlled distribution, patient cards, direct healthcare professional communications — DHPC). US analogue: FDA REMS database ↗. Example: clozapine REMS update.
How is AI being applied to pharmacovigilance signal detection?
AI in pharmacovigilance: (1) NLP for literature and social media mining: identifying unlabelled reactions from case reports and patient-reported data outside ICSRs; (2) ML signal detection: XGBoost/random forest models trained on historical FAERS gold-standard signals — outperform PRR/ROR on sensitivity; (3) LLM case processing: automated causality assessment (WHO-UMC criteria), MedDRA coding suggestions, PSUR narrative drafting; (4) Computer-aided signal management: prioritisation scoring for human review, reducing workload on high-volume databases. Regulatory position: EMA AI reflection paper ↗ addresses validation requirements. Related: FDA AI/ML SaMD guidance, safety biomarkers.